Monroeville police investigate recent burglaries
A teen was charged in connection with a June 11 burglary after a “vigilant neighbor” called police, Monroeville police Chief Steve Pascarella said.
The suspect, whose name and hometown haven't been made public by police, is accused of kicking in a basement window on Rosecrest Drive at about 5 p.m. Pascarella said the teen was in the house when police arrived.
The suspect was 17 years old at the time of the arrest and was charged in juvenile court, Pascarella said.
There has been a rash of burglaries in the area. Monroeville police have investigated seven residential burglaries over the past 30 days, Pascarella said.
Police were searching for an older green sport-utility vehicle this week in connection with three recent burglaries on Bert Drive, Pascarella said. Police said those three break-ins were executed similarly.
“The crimes appear to be focused on items that can be quickly resold for cash,” Pascarella said.
Despite the recent incidents, Monroeville police have been alerted to significantly fewer burglaries than this time last year. By the end of June 2012, police had responded to more than 60 burglary reports, Pascarella said. So far this year, that number is 21 burglaries, he said.
“The numbers are below average, but we need residents to continue to watch out for their neighbors and report suspicious persons and vehicles.”
Kyle Lawson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8755, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.