ShareThis Page

Miscalculation costs Monroeville $400K in revenue

| Wednesday, July 24, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Turmoil in the municipal building has cost Monroeville about $400,000 in revenue, the local tax collector says.

When a new millage was being calculated in February, municipal administrators failed to account for the most recent property assessment appeals, which has resulted in a $400,000 shortfall, Monroeville tax collector Pat Fulkerson said. While the shortfall affects the current budget year, council might have to increase the property-tax rate next year to make up the difference, Fulkerson said.

Council members are weighing their options.

Councilwoman Lois Drumheller suggested outsourcing emergency dispatch services to the county, a switch that has been projected to save the municipality about $600,000. Drumheller and Councilman Bernhard Erb voted in favor of moving the dispatch center in January. They were outvoted 5-2.

When Allegheny County reassessed property values in 2012, some Monroeville property owners appealed their assessments. Those who won their appeals pay less in property taxes to Monroeville. The county's most accurate projection of appeals was available to municipal administrators in January, but administrators never factored the estimate into the new millage rate, Fulkerson said.

Monroeville Mayor Greg Erosenko blamed municipal Manager Lynette McKinney.

“Ultimately it's the manager's responsibility to come up with that number,” said Erosenko, who has pushed to have McKinney removed from the manager's position.

McKinney could not be reached for comment.

She was appointed to the position in March after working as an administrative assistant to the manager for several years and then, as an interim manager for part of 2012. Her predecessor, Jeff Silka, resigned under pressure from council in late January.

Council adopted the tax rate in early March.

Fulkerson said he told officials in early February that the millage would have to be recalculated before it was approved. He said McKinney then sent him an email asking him to recalculate the millage rate. Fulkerson said he refused.

“There's not a tax collector out there that calculates the millage,” he said. “It's not my responsibility to go through (the manager's budget) and through the process to find out what the millage rate is.”

He said a disagreement between himself and McKinney around the time that the millage was being calculated also factored in to his decision.

Fulkerson said he was suspended temporarily in February by McKinney after he made a comment at a January council meeting about a possible conflict of interest involving Monroeville finance director Sue Werksmen.

He said the suspension was based on a section of the employee handbook that addresses employee behavior. But Fulkerson said he never was an employee of Monroeville. He said that he worked as an independent contractor when he collected business and earned income taxes.

Drumheller said that regardless of Fulkerson's personal grievances, he should have done more to correct the millage as the elected property tax collector.

“He could have done something,” Drumheller said.

Kyle Lawson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8755, or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.