Police Chief Farally gets Civil Service protection
After passing a verbal exam about situational policing and getting the blessing of the borough Civil Service Commission, Pitcairn police Chief Scott Farally recieved unanimous support from Pitcairn Council, which voted Tuesday to grant him Civil Service status.
The 7-0 vote means Farally — who was named interim chief in June and had the “interim” tag removed later in the summer — has legal protection should any borough politicians try to remove him from the job.
“That keeps him in his position and makes it pretty hard (for borough officials) to get rid of him,” Pitcairn Council President John Prucnal.
Not that officials are eager to do so.
Prucnal said Farally, who lives in Pitcairn, is well regarded throughout the community.
“Everyone seems to like what he's doing, meaning council and residents,” Prucnal said. “The residents love the guy.”
Borough officials said Farally has put an emphasis on increasing foot patrols in the community, in addition to nightly business checks. In addition to the chief, Pitcairn has three full-time and eight part-time officers.
Farally said he used vacation days to complete executive-development training over the summer at the Allegheny County Police Academy. The course was an outreach program provided by Penn State Justice Studies. It was three weeks long, five days a week, eight hours a day.
“It was pretty intense supervisor training,” Farally said. “It was great.”
Farally was appointed when former Chief Dennis Hockenberry retired.
Officials said their confidence in Farally has grown during his first few months on the job.
“We feel pretty strongly about the work he's doing and wanted to leave no doubt about our support for him,” Councilman John Bova said Tuesday.
Kyle Lawson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8755, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.