Cole returns as Monroeville chief
Newly rehired Monroeville police Chief Kenneth “Doug” Cole stepped back into the thick of things on Wednesday.
In addition to being briefed on current investigations, Cole said he is evaluating the training of newly hired officers and starting to review the municipality's 2014 budget.
“The budget is the big line item that we're looking at here,” said Cole, who met briefly with interim municipal Manager Timothy Little.
Cole, 54, returned to work after Monroeville Council voted 7-0 on Tuesday night to bring him back to lead the Monroeville Police Department. He had been demoted in February and fired in September by then-municipal Manager Lynette McKinney.
Four newly seated Monroeville Council members and three incumbents have argued that Cole was unjustly removed from the position.
Cole provides the police department with the competent, permanent leader it needs, Monroeville Mayor Gregory Erosenko said.
“And the other thing is we're putting qualified, educated people back in key positions,” he said.
Former council members Diane Allison, Lois Drumheller, Bernhard Erb and Clarence Ramsey, who were critical of Cole during his first tenure as police chief, couldn't be reached for comment. McKinney also couldn't be reached.
Cole was removed as chief amid an audit by the state attorney general's office that found privacy violations involving the dispatch computer system, and a complaint filed with the federal government.
He never should have been fired, said Monroeville resident Ralph Greco, 72.
“Because I felt he was doing a great job. Just the way he handled the police department. He was a very fair man as far as the way he treated everybody,” Greco said.
Hired as a Monroeville patrolman in 1985, Cole was promoted to chief in 2010 and remained in that position until February.
As a result of political bickering that gave rise to personnel changes, taxpayers so far have paid about $130,000 to managers in severance pay and are expected to pay Cole between $10,000 and $15,000 in back pay.
Cole said he now oversees a department with 46 police officers. Since March, 10 officers have been hired, but one did not pass the probationary period, he said.
The department anticipates hiring up to five officers by March because of retirements, he said.
The budget process will help dictate his staffing, Cole said. Monroeville's 2014 proposed budget is $26.6 million, including about $10 million for police operations.
The budget typically is passed by Dec. 31, but because of council changes and other issues, it is anticipated that the council will vote on it on Feb. 11, Little said.
Monroeville has had four different managers and two police chiefs in the past two years.
Council is scheduled to vote on a contract for Cole in February, Little said.
“I believe that I was treated unfairly when I was demoted and subsequently fired. And I certainly believe I had a lot to offer the department. … I did not do anything that I should not have been chief,” Cole said.
After Cole was demoted, then-Assistant Chief Steve Pascarella ascended to the chief's job. Pascarella filed a complaint with Department of Health and Human Services in 2012, claiming a possible privacy violation involving the dispatch center's paging system occurred while Cole was in charge. That investigation continues.
Pascarella resigned as chief in November while on short-term disability and dropped in rank to lieutenant with McKinney's consent. He remained on short-term disability as of Tuesday, Little said.
Tory N. Parrish and Kyle Lawson are staff writers for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.