Monroeville officials to consider 1.57-mill tax hike
Monroeville property owners could see a real-estate tax increase for the second consecutive year.
A proposed 2014 budget put together by municipal Manager Tim Little would increase the tax rate by 1.57 mills. Last year, a half-mill increase resulted in a 2.431-mill tax rate.
The tax hike would generate $3.3 million, amidst a growing debt service and a shortfall of commercial property tax revenue in 2013 due to reassessment appeals, Little wrote in the proposed 2014 budget.
New revenue could be used primarily for two purposes, according to the proposed budget:
• Reduce debt and improve the credit rating by funding capital improvement projects directly, instead of issuing bonds.
• Make an annual contribution to the Other Post Employment Benefits fund, which financial experts recommend to ensure a healthy budget in future years.
If council would approve the budget in March, the owner of a Monroeville home valued at $100,000 would pay $400 toward municipal real estate taxes in 2014. That represents a $157 increase from 2013.
Little declined to comment on the budget until Feb. 11, which he said was the official release date. An advanced copy of the proposed budget was obtained by the Times Express prior to the meeting.
Public hearings to discuss the budget are scheduled for Feb. 26 and March 6.
Kyle Lawson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8755, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.