Share This Page

Pittsburgh man accused of stalking 9-year-old waives hearing

| Wednesday, Feb. 19, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

A man accused of stalking a 9-year-old girl in Pitcairn is scheduled to appear April 8 in front of an Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas judge.

Carlos A. Ayala, 36, of Arabella Street in Pittsburgh waived a preliminary hearing Tuesday on charges of stalking, simple assault and harassment in connection with a Feb. 10 incident on Fifth Street, according to a clerk at the Monroeville court of district Judge Jeffrey Herbst.

The paperwork for the preliminary hearing had not been completed by this edition's deadline.

The girl told Pitcairn police on the day of the incident that she had been walking with friends after school at about 3:30 p.m. on the 500 block of Fifth Street.

She said an adult man — whom she later identified as Ayala — began to follow them, according to the criminal complaint, and that the man grabbed the back of her hooded jacket.

She said she screamed, “Run,” at which point the man ran in between two houses, the complaint said.

Police confirmed Ayala was working a construction job in the neighborhood and located him the same day.

Ayala told police he saw the children walking on Fifth Street but he did not have “any interaction” with them,” according to the complaint.

Kyle Lawson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8755, or klawson@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.