ShareThis Page

Monroeville officials happy with findings of health care investigation

| Wednesday, March 26, 2014, 4:06 p.m.

Monroeville officials were happy to learn Monday that a federal investigation has determined that the municipality did not violate a federal law designed to protect people's health care information.

In a March 21 letter to municipal officials, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said its Office for Civil Rights “finds that there has been no violations of the privacy, security, or breach reporting rules and is, therefore, closing this case,” wrote Barbara Holland, regional manager for the office.

Interim municipal manager Tim Little said the letter brought welcome news.

“It's great for Monroeville to get out from under this cloud,” he said.

An investigation into whether Monroeville violated the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or HIPAA, was launched when then-assistant police Chief Steve Pascarella in 2012 said a retired municipal employee obtained details about an emergency medical call and forwarded the information to someone who wasn't involved in the emergency.

Federal investigators determined that because the dispatch center, police department and fire department are not health care providers or health plans, they are not subject to the HIPAA privacy law, Holland said.

HIPAA does apply to the Monroeville ambulance service, but medical information gathered by emergency medical staff goes into a secure database, the investigation found.

Year of turmoil

The investigation was at the center of more than a year of political turmoil that included the demotion, suspension, firing and rehiring of police Chief Kenneth “Doug” Cole and the promotion to chief of Pascarella, who later resigned from the position and now is a lieutenant.

Neither Pascarella nor Cole would comment on the government's findings.

Pascarella's complaint led municipal leaders to take steps to ensure that emergency-call alerts go only to active personnel through the dispatch center.

Monroeville maintains its own dispatch center, separate from the Allegheny County 911 system.

Council hired the downtown Pittsburgh law firm of Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote to investigate and respond to inquiries by the federal government.

Officals estimated Monday the cost of the investigation will exceed $50,000. An exact figure is expected to be presented at the council workshop on April 3.

Cole, who was in charge of the dispatch center, was demoted in February 2013 amid accusations that federal or state privacy laws were broken when unauthorized people accessed protected police information under Cole's watch.

After being fired, Cole sued the municipality. He was rehired as chief when new members of Monroeville Council took office in January. His lawsuit still is pending.

Pascarella is on six-month disability, which is scheduled to expire April 1.

Files viewed

In addition to the federal investigation, the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office conducted an audit of the 911 dispatch computer system last year. The audit concluded that unauthorized people viewed sensitive police information that included criminal-history records.

That audit determined that officials took the appropriate steps to secure the sensitive data and discipline personnel tied to unauthorized access of information.

A dispatcher who was fired by former manager Lynette McKinney — who, herself, has been fired by council — amid the internal investigation since has been rehired by Little.

The end of the federal investigation won't change the hiring process of emergency personnel or the way the dispatch center operates, officials said this week.

Official reaction

A majority of 2013 council members — Drumheller, Diane Allison, Clarence Ramsey and Bernhard Erb, none of whom still are in office — supported the internal investigation by Pittsburgh attorneys, which also aided in the attorney general's audit.

“The Attorney General's Office was clear when they commended a punitive action,” Drumheller said.

“Health information and criminal records should never be mistreated this way again.”

Mayor Greg Erosenko and councilmen Steve Duncan, Jim Johns and Nick Gresock argued last year that the internal investigation was an unnecessary use of taxpayer money.

They argued a municipal employee could have compiled the information required by the federal government as part of the investigation. Some officials and residents accused the former majority and Pascarella of conspiring to replace Cole as police chief for political reasons.

“I'm glad it's over,” Johns said Monday. “Two years of listening to accusations.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.