Gateway parents criticize communication after so-called 'hit list'
A few Gateway Middle School parents awoke to a troubling text message Friday morning because a school police officer confiscated a so-called “hit list” from three students the day before.
Principal Tony Aquilio sent the text about midnight only to parents of students included on the hard-copy list. District policy prohibits phone calls after 10:30 p.m.
“School administration and the school resource officer investigated an alleged hit list written by multiple students,” Aquilio wrote.
“The appropriate actions were taken to determine the validity of the alleged threat, and there was no malicious intent discovered. ... At no point was any student or teacher in any danger.”
Gateway Middle School parent Kim Edgar said she learned of the incident via Facebook and kept her child home from school Friday because she didn't receive an email, phone call or text message from the district.
“I was very angry,” Edgar said. “They can call and tell me about fundraisers, but they can't call about this?”
Monroeville police Chief Doug Cole said a teacher overheard two male students talking in class on March 19 about who they would “take out.”
A school police officer who investigated the incident told Cole, who learned about the incident Friday, that the students were apologetic. The three were disciplined in-house, district spokeswoman Cara Zanella said.
More than 600 students attend Gateway Middle School, which houses seventh- and eighth-graders from Monroeville and Pitcairn.
Superintendent Nina Zetty found out about the list on Facebook, Zanella said.
“It was handled well, but there was a problem with communication,” Zanella said. “Their investigation found it was not a credible hit list.”
Parents criticized the district on the social-media site.
“NO communication, either letter or phone call, from the school district,” read a late-night post from the Facebook profile of a person who said he is a Gateway parent. “In matters such as this, it is VITAL for the District to inform parents of the students as to whether or not the presence of such a list was true or not.”
Cole said the students' actions don't require police action but that the Monroeville officer who first investigated the incident should have spoken to him, regardless of whether there was “malicious intent.”
“Because of the times we live in, (school officials) take everything very seriously,” Zanella said.
A mass shooting in 1999 in Columbine High School in Colorado was followed by multiple school shootings nationwide, including a shooting in Sandy Hook Elementary in Connecticut in 2012 that claimed 26 lives.
Gateway Middle School reported 17 incidents involving 29 offenders last school year, including five that prompted police action, according to state-mandated Safe Schools Reports. Seven students among 18 total offenders were arrested in the 2011-12 school year. The school reported no arrests in the three previous years.
A similar incident was reported in the Brownsville Area School District this week. There, a middle school student was accused of posting a hit list, officials said. Parents were notified, but officials would not say whether the student was suspended or expelled.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.