ShareThis Page

Pitcairn considers covering school officer cost

| Wednesday, May 7, 2014, 7:06 p.m.

Pitcairn officials are considering paying up to help keep a police officer stationed at Gateway Middle School.

Pitcairn Council members discussed the possibility of helping fund a middle school officer at their May 5 agenda meeting.

“There was no immediate objection to it. Everyone understood the circumstance,” said Councilman Jack Bova, chairman of the public-safety committee. “And at least, from my perspective, we can swing it financially, and I think we are in favor of having a police officer in the school.”

Less than a week after the April 9 knife attack at Franklin Regional High School, Monroeville police Chief Doug Cole said the municipal budget couldn't cover the cost to station an officer at the middle school for next school year. Gateway School District spokeswoman Cara Zanella said the district can't afford it, either.

An officer has been at the school since January, and Monroeville has covered the full cost. The district and municipality split the $150,000 for stationing an officer at Gateway High School.

Pitcairn council's next meeting will be May 12 at 7:30 p.m. in the borough building, 582 Sixth St.

Patrick Varine is a news editor with Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8745, or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.