Pitcairn seminar teaches police life-saving techniques
Dr. Daniel Schwartz, Forbes EMS Medical Director, West Penn Allegheny Health System, teaches area law enforcement agencies how to react to an 'officer down' situation in a workshop hosted by Pitcairn Police Department on June 3. Officers Patrick Loalbo, Mike Morency and Karl Kinkopf study the technique demonstrated by Schwartz.
Photo by Lillian DeDomenic | For The Times Express
Life-saving techniques learned in Iraq and Afghanistan were the focus of an “officer down” seminar in Pitcairn last week.
The seminar was organized by Pitcairn police Chief Scott Farally and taught by Dr. Dan Schwartz of Forbes Regional Hospital.
“Police officers are taught many of the same lessons that we teach soldiers regarding immediate life-threatening care at the point of injury,” Schwartz said.
In the past, officers were taught the ABCs of life-saving techniques: Airway, Bleeding, Circulation, Schwartz said.
But that no longer is the case.
“We now are teaching officers to focus on hemorrhage control as soon as possible,” Schwartz said.
“That means early use of tourniquets and hemostatic bandages to speed clotting.”
And regardless of the injury in an active shooter situation, the shooter takes first priority, Farally said.
“You don't have time to put on a tourniquet if you're being shot at,” Farally said.
“You have to neutralize that threat before you can initiate care.”
Nearly 20 officers from Pitcairn, Turtle Creek, East Pittsburgh and the University of Pittsburgh attended the seminar.
“This class went above and beyond your basic first-aid techniques,” Farally said.
“(Police officers) are so used to running around and treating everyone else, but the concept of treating ourselves has been lost.”
Kyle Lawson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8755, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.