Monroeville parents said they were surprised and disappointed to learn a free summer park program was eliminated from the 2014 budget.
In past years, college-age students would oversee team sports and other activities at nine neighborhood parks on weekdays, but municipal administrators said the program was eliminated because of low attendance.
Monroeville parent Kathy Buzzie said she learned recently from a neighbor the program was cut.
“I was livid because my kids anxiously await the summer program every year,” Buzzie said.
The municipality saved about $30,000 as part of a $29.4 million budget this year by cutting two leaders per park, said citizen information director Joe Sedlak at a council meeting on Thursday.
Councilman Steve Duncan argued that programs at some of the parks, such as Pioneer and Bellwood, are well attended.
“The ones that have a higher usage … we should possibly look in to reinstating that,” he said.
Council members Linda Gaydos and Jim Johns said they, too, received calls from parents upset over the elimination of the program.
Park leaders were invaluable because they helped ensure the safety of the children, said Monroeville parent Bobbie Robak, whose children attended activities at Hawkeye parks for years.
“They would have my cellphone number; I would have theirs,” Robak said. “That's how close you would get with them.”
Manager Tim Little said if council wants to reinstate the funds to support the program in 2015, “something else will have to give.”
Kyle Lawson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8755.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.