ShareThis Page

Monroeville swears in 5 new police officers

| Wednesday, June 11, 2014, 3:21 p.m.
Five new Monroeville officers were sworn in. officers, from left, included: Francis Speranza, Jeremy Frisk, Joseph Miller, Brad Martin Jr. and William Supancic .
Kyle Lawson | Times Express
Five new Monroeville officers were sworn in. officers, from left, included: Francis Speranza, Jeremy Frisk, Joseph Miller, Brad Martin Jr. and William Supancic .

The Monroeville police force is younger than years past, but also experienced.

Five new Monroeville officers were sworn in by Mayor Greg Erosenko Tuesday to help fill vacancies left by retirements.

“The good part about hiring in Monroeville is that we get experienced officers,” Cole said.

The officers brought with them an average of 10 years experience in areas such as Pittsburgh, Penn Hills, Pitcairn and North Versailles.

The department lost 13 officers to retirement and two officers died for reasons unrelated to work since 2013. The municipality has hired 16 new officers over the last two years.

Officer Joseph Miller, who has seven years experience in Pitcairn and Oakmont, said he grew up in Plum and has grandparents who live in Monroeville.

“It's nice to come to this municipality and finally be a part of it,” Miller said. “I'm familiar with the area and the people.”

Monroeville officers are among the highest paid in the state, but they also respond to more calls than an average municipality due to a large business district that tends to attract criminals from other areas who deal drugs and commit retail thefts.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.