Hearing waived for mother of Monroeville boy whose bookbag contained gun
The mother of a kindergartener who arrived at school with a gun in his book bag waived a preliminary hearing Tuesday in front of a Monroeville judge.
Stephanie L. Roth, 32, waived a preliminary hearing on charges of endangering the welfare of a child, recklessly endangering another person and possession of drug paraphernalia.
The boy discovered the gun on April 30 when he arrived at Ramsey Elementary in Monroeville.
He immediately showed the gun to his teacher, which led to subsequent charges, according to the criminal complaint.
The child is being cared for by a grandparent, while Roth has completed inpatient drug rehabilitation and will be taking parenting classes in an effort to try to “get her life straight,” said her attorney Owen Seman.
“Anything that she can do to help herself out, she's going to do,” Seman said.
Roth told police there were several people she suspected were drug dealers who carried guns in her apartment the night before the incident.
She told police that when she was in another room, they were sitting at a table next to the bookbag.
Monroeville police were unable to trace the gun to an owner.
“I don't think there's any question that there were other people that may have some responsibility with that gun getting in the kid's backpack,” Seman said.
“There's a lot of other things out there that are kind of unknowns at this point.”
Roth moved to Braddock since the incident.
A formal arraignment in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas is scheduled for 1 p.m. on Aug. 4.
Kyle Lawson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8755, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.