Parents fight contract renewal for Gateway basketball coach
Accusations that Gateway basketball coach Mitch Adams “bullies” his players will delay a vote to potentially renew his contract.
Gateway parent Betty Howard said Wednesday she's heard second hand from multiple upperclassman on the team that Adams used obscenities and vulgar language directed at players during games and at practices.
“We don't talk to our kids that way, so I'm not going to allow a man we trust with them to talk that way,” said Howard, whose son is a sophomore on the team.
Adams declined to comment Wednesday.
Howard said she and a few other parents shared their accusations with the Gateway athletic director and superintendent last school year. She said they were concerned to see his contract was up for renewal.
A district official said after the meeting Wednesday a vote to potentially renew Adams' contract will be removed from the June 25 agenda, while the district investigates the matter.
“At least they're listening,” Howard said. “ We just feel like our hands are tied.”
Gateway spokesperson Cara Zanella said the district could not comment on the accusations.
Under Adams, the Gateway basketball team made it to the WPIAL championship game three times from 2010 to 2012, and won twice. The team also qualified for the WPIAL playoffs the last five years.
Kyle Lawson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412- 8712369 or at email@example.com. Staff writer Mike Love also contributed to this report.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.