Gateway school board reverses direction, renews basketball coach's contract
Gateway High School boys basketball coach Mitch Adams will return to his post next school year, amid accusations of inappropriate coaching tactics and a school board vote that may have violated the Sunshine Act.
The school board voted to renew Adam's contract Wednesday, one week after members of a Gateway family accused Adams of degrading players with vulgar language.
“It's disappointing and astounding actually that (coaches) aren't held to the same standards that we are as parents of the players,” said Gateway parent LaNa Crosby-Howard at the June 25 school board meeting. “I'd like that to be changed in the future.”
Crosby-Howard, who said her son quit the team last year, said she and other adult members of her family plan to file a complaint with the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission.
After a June 18 board meeting, the contract renewal was removed from the June 25 agenda to investigate the matter. Then, the board unexpectedly put the item back on the agenda during the meeting Wednesday. District policy only allows for comment on agenda items at the start of the meeting, which meant parents couldn't comment until after the contract was approved.
The process could put the district at risk of being sued, said Melissa Melewsky, media law counsel with the Pennsylvania News Media Association.
“This raises significant sunshine act compliance issues,” Melewsky said Thursday. “The sunshine act requires public comment before the agenda item is voted on.”
Solicitor Craig Alexander oversaw the motion to add the item back on to the agenda and after the vote advised board president Dave Magill to allow residents to comment.
School Director Skip Drumheller voted against the motion to add the contract renewal back on to the agenda, but would only said afterward that his vote “spoke for itself.
Kyle Lawson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-871-2369 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.