Gateway School Board to vote on new terroristic-threats policy
A proposed policy for Gateway School District could prevent news of a threat by a student from reaching Facebook before the superintendent.
A terroristic-threats policy scheduled for a school board vote Aug. 27 would require a building principal to “immediately inform the superintendent upon receiving the report of such a threat.”
The policy states the school board acknowledges “the need for an immediate and effective response” to any situation involving such a threat or act that constitutes a terroristic threat as defined by state law.
The policy was proposed after an incident in March when some Gateway parents first learned about a reported threat of violence toward Gateway Middle School students several hours after it was made.
Superintendent Nina Zetty first learned of the reported threat on Facebook after the school day was over, Gateway spokeswoman Cara Zanella said in March.
Then-principal Tony Aquilio sent a text to parents at about midnight, Zanella said at the time.
Aquilio has since accepted another position as Penn-Trafford High School principal for the upcoming school year. He said Monday that the move had nothing to do with his handling of the March incident, and the proposed policy will help ensure the safety of students.
“I handled every situation according to the policies in place,” Aquilio said.
Zetty concurred the proposed policy was not connected to the incident in March.
She said the terroristic-threats policy would match similar policies in place at schools throughout Pennsylvania.
“We've been doing policy audits to see what's required (by the state) and what's missing,” Zetty said.
“All school districts are required to have a terroristic-threats policy.”
Kyle Lawson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-871-2369 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.