ShareThis Page

Monongahela woman accused of Girl Scout cookies theft

| Friday, Oct. 12, 2012, 12:01 a.m.
Karen M. Burton
Karen M. Burton

MONONGAHELA – A Monongahela woman is accused of failing to pay for 150 boxes of Girl Scout cookies she ordered.

Karen M. Burton, 44, of 521 Park Ave., is charged with theft by failure to make required disposition of funds received for allegedly failing to pay $600 owed to her daughter's Girl Scout troop for cookies.

According to the affidavit of probable cause filed at the Monongahela office of Magisterial District Judge Mark Wilson, troop leader Melissa Schuster reported to police Burton failed to pay for the cookies.

Burton allegedly told police she paid $200 toward the cookies, but said she did not know if she had any receipts, according to the affidavit. Burton said she also made payments to Sue Jenkins of the Western Pa. Girl Scout Association. Jenkins also told police she hadn't received any payments, according to the affidavit. Police said Burton failed to provide any receipts during the investigation.

Burton was arraigned Wednesday by Wilson and remanded to the Washington County Correctional Facility in lieu of $5,000 cash bond.

She faces a prelimimary hearing at 10:15 a.m. Oct. 17.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.