Rostraver library donation rings a bell
Every time Mark Baker goes to the Rostraver Public Library he will see the Vanduzen Bell outside facility, it will bring back good memories.
“It will be a constant reminder of my mother and her strength,” Baker said. “And I can only hope to follow the same course of life.”
His mother, Mary Moodey of Charleroi, was a dedicated employee for more than 40 years at Southwestern Pennsylvania Human Services Inc. in Monessen.
Mark Baker said he purchased the bell and displayed it in the yard of his Salem Church Road home in the township before moving recently to North Charleroi.
Baker chose to donate the bell to the Rostraver Public Library in memory of his mother.
“My neighbor was employed at the library so I thought it would be a good thing to do with the bell,” he said.
Baker said he spoke to the library board, which welcomed the donation.
A dedication ceremony was held recently at the library. The bell was placed in the island at the entrance of Rostraver Library.
The bell has historic roots.
Vanduzen and Tift manufactured cannons during the Civil War. After the war, the company switched to manufacturing bells.
E.W. Vanduzen was the successor to the G.W. Coffin Bell Foundry in Cincinnati, Ohio.
Coffin was known for making among the most ornamental bells in the country. But when Vanduzen took over the foundry, he discontinued the ornamentation and changed the bells' shape so they made a better tone.
Vanduzen was the first manufacturer of the rotary yoke bells, having manufactured and patented the design in 1866.
Vanduzen was one of the largest foundries in the country, producing thousands of bells each year.
The bell that Baker donated to the library was produced in 1875. Baker said he believes that “a library unites a community and the bell will commensurate this vision.”
Chris Buckley is a reporter for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.