Grandmother charged in abuse case
A Speers woman has been charged for allegedly striking her 5-year-old grandson with a hammer and bounding him to the bed.
Carmen Alexander, 45, of 253 Davidson Drive, was charged Wednesday with aggravated assault, simple assault, recklessly endangering another person, unlawful restraint and endangering the welfare of children.
She was arraigned before Magisterial District Judge Larry Hopkins and released after posting $100,000 bond.
According to the affidavit of probable cause, Alexander was the caregiver for her grandson. The child sustained bruising, scratches, burns, scars and trauma over much of his body, including a lump on his forehead.
The child told police Alexander struck him with a hammer as punishment and bond his wrists with zip ties to the bedpost. He had bite marks on his hands from attempting to free himself.
Police found zip ties in the child's bedroom and broken zip ties attached to the bedpost, according to the affidavit.
The child was treated at Monongahela Valley Hospital, where medical reports, photographs and treatment were documented.
Alexander told police she once “zip-tied” the child's wrists to show him how police handcuff suspects. According to the affidavit, Alexander told police she witnessed her son's ex-girlfriend strike the child with a metal spoon on several occasions, but never reported the alleged incident.
Chris Buckley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-684-2642 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.