ShareThis Page

Trial set for Charleroi man accused of rape

| Wednesday, Feb. 27, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Anthony Lane

Jury selection is expected to begin next week for a Charleroi man facing rape charges for a second time in the case.

Anthony Lane, 49, of 426 Fallowfield Ave., was charged in May with one count each of criminal attempt to commit rape, criminal attempt to commit sexual assault, burglary, simple assault and harassment.

According to the affidavit of probable cause, Lane allegedly broke into the victim's Charleroi home on March 4. Lane claimed that he had paid the woman for sex.

The charges were initially dropped after the victim failed to show for a preliminary hearing. But the district attorney ordered the charges re-filed after it was determined the victim was not advised of the date and time of the hearing.

After being released following the scheduled hearing April 5, Lane was arrested April 11 after he allegedly made two telephone calls to the victim, who had obtained a protection from abuse order against him.

Lane is registered with the Pennsylvania State Police under Megan's Law requirements, because he was convicted of rape elsewhere.

He is awaiting trial in the Washington County Correctional Facility where he has been held since April 20 in lieu of bonds for $100,000 and $35,000.

Chris Buckley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-684-2642 or cbuckley@tribweb.com

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.