ShareThis Page

Ringgold audit motion fails

| Wednesday, March 6, 2013, 12:36 a.m.

The Ringgold School Board considered – and fought over – a motion to have an accounting firm verify figures previously presented by business manager Randy Skrinjorich.

But the motion at a special meeting Tuesday, failed – apparently by design.

“We were trying to satisfy people who doubted Randy's numbers,” board President Mariann Bulko said, shortly after voting no on the motion, which failed, 4-4.

The motion was to hire the district's auditing firm, Cypher & Cypher, to verify Skrinjorich's calculations for the cost of operating the Monongahela and Donora elementary centers – both closed – as middle schools as opposed to building a new middle school.

Skrinjorich had calculated the additional cost at $445,000.

Director Larry Mauro questioned the $2,500 to $3,000 expense for the audit, saying it was excessive because the firm would be just reviewing the business manager's calculations.

Director Bob Smith said he questioned the nearly half million dollar calculation for utilities.

Skrinjorich said the calculation included such costs as added transportation to carry students to two middle school buildings compared to one building, plus custodial services.

“When these figures were presented by Randy, no one agreed with them,” Bulko said. “Either you really want to know and verify their accuracy, or you don't.”

Director Chuck Smith said he initially disagreed with Skrinjorich's figures because he mistakenly thought they were just for utility costs.

“Charlie, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to determine it costs more to operate two buildings than one,” Bulko said.

In December, the board voted, 5-4, to hire an architect for a new middle school.

At that time, Bulko, Bill Stein, Chris Carroll, Carol Flament and Maureen Ott voted to hire an architect. Chuck Smith, Bob Smith, Gene Kennedy and Lawrence Mauro voted no.

Any plan cannot go forward until Ringgold begins the PlanCon procedure. PlanCon, short for Planning and Construction Workbook, is a set of forms and procedures used to apply for state reimbursement for projects.

Before the board voted on the audit motion, Chuck Smith protested that board members received agendas just minutes before the special session began.

“I've been here since 6 p.m. for an executive session, yet I was given this five minutes before the meeting started,” Smith said. “You're trying to stick it down our throats.”

“Then vote it down, if you like,” Bulko said.

Chuck Smith voted down the motion, along with Bob Smith, Mauro – and Bulko.

Chris Buckley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-684-2642 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.