Former food service director facing charges
A former food service director in the Yough School District faces a preliminary hearing Monday on charges accusing her of stealing nearly $26,000 from the district.
Kristen Matey, 37, of 122 East Lane, Jacobs Creek, was charged with theft by unlawful taking or disposition, receiving stolen property, and theft by failure to make required disposition of funds received.
According to the affidavit of probable cause, Matey allegedly stole $25,959 in 2011 and 2012.
Matey's responsibilities included making bank deposits for cafeteria sales.
In March 2012, district Business Manager Michael Wrobleski noticed that Matey had been turning in late cash sheets needed to prepare accurate financial reports for the school board. Matey blamed the delay on her assistant, whom she said was having personal problems, according to the affidavit.
In August, a board member complained that a check submitted for the cafeteria two months prior had not yet been cashed.
Yough Superintendent Dr. Janet Sardon approached Nutrition Inc., which conducted an internal investigation and discovered some boxes of missing deposit slips and receipts that Matey was in charge of depositing into the district's account, according to the affidavit.
An audit contracted by the school district and Nutrition Inc. discovered $25,959 missing. According to the affidavit, Matey admitted she was stealing money from the district account “because she had encountered some unforeseen financial difficulties over the past year.”
Sardon referred all calls for comment to district solicitor Gary Matta, who could not be reached for comment.
Chris Buckley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-684-2642 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.