3 injured in 2-vehicle accident on Interstate 70 in Rostraver Township
A tow truck worker removes the heavily-damaged vehicle that was carrying Robert and Carol Cochran of Charleroi on Sunday evening, March 23, 2013, along Interstate 70 West in Rostraver. State police said the pair were struck by a vehicle driven by Jack Bridge Jr. of Belle Vernon near the Exit 41 on-ramp. All three were taken via ambulence to a hospital for undisclosed injuries.
Three Mid-Mon Valley residents suffered injuries after a two-vehicle accident Sunday evening at Exit 41 along Interstate 70 West.
State police said Robert and Carol Cochran of Charleroi were driving in the right lane at approximately 7 p.m. when a Jeep driven by Jack Bridge Jr., 42, of Belle Vernon sped from the on-ramp from Route 906, spun out and hit the Cochran's Chevrolet sedan almost nose-to-nose.
Police said Bridge was unconscious when firefighters and paramedics placed him in the ambulance. Carol Cochran was the last to leave the scene via ambulance and was able to stand but appeared shaken.
The Cochrans were taken to UPMC-Presbyterian in Pittsburgh. A spokeswomen at Monongahela Valley Hospital in Carroll Township said Bridge was treated and released.
Police indicated charges may be pending against Bridge pending an investigation of witness accounts.
Both vehicles were towed away via flatbed while police and firefighters restricted traffic to a single lane following a nearly 30-minute backup along Interstate 70.
Along with state police, Rostraver Central fire company and Rostraver/West Newton Emergency Services responded to the accident.
Rick Bruni Jr. is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 724-684-2635.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.