Shooting disrupts Monessen's McKee Avenue
By Chris Buckley
Published: Friday, March 29, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Katrina Dellolio watched astonished as two black males fired shots at each other in the 200 block of McKee Ave., shortly before 5 p.m. Thursday.
A Monessen police officer at the scene declined comment.
Dellolio said the first shots were fired right in front of her 213 McKee Ave. home.
A black male driving a two-door blue car drove up McKee Ave., telling a second unidentified black male that he intended to shoot him.
The two men exchanged shots. Dellolio estimated that the man in the car alone fired an entire clip from a small handgun.
The intended target fled on foot, running onto a porch of a vacant house at 200 McKee Ave. before fleeing up the hill behind the house.
The other shooter drove off, she said.
Dellolio said there are families with young children in the neighborhood who are often on the street. It was fortunate that no one was struck by a stray bullet, she said.
A city police officer answering the 911 call retrieved two bullet casings from the stone steps leading up to the residence at 200 McKee Ave.
“It's kind of scary,” said Dellolio, who has lived in the neighborhood for three years.
“This is my first time seeing anything like this. This neighborhood is pretty quiet.”
Chris Buckley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-684-2642 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Traffic stop sparks two chases
- Theft suspect, wife, taken into police custody
- Valley native exits troubled Ukraine
- Monessen students might lose cell phones
- Ringgold state cash decision can wait
- Charges dismissed in Charleroi missing lease case
- Ringgold pushing ahead with school construction?
- New Eagle motorists warned to buckle up
- Washington Co. needs poll workers
- Two more Washington County drug suspects jailed
- Police update fatal I-70 crash probe