N. Charleroi man charged in alleged heroin case
A North Charleroi man was arrested after police allegedly found three bricks of suspected heroin inside a body cavity during a traffic stop Monday in Charleroi.
Calvin Kovalchuk, 24, of 465 Fourth St. is charged with possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia, Charleroi Regional Police reported.
According to an affidavit of probable cause filed with Magisterial District Judge Larry Hopkins in Charleroi, police stopped a vehicle driven by John Gudel in the 1200 block of Lincoln Avenue shortly before 6 p.m.
Police said they knew Gudel's driver's license had been suspended.
Kovalchuk was a passenger in the vehicle, and upon being searched was allegedly found to have 171 stamp bags – equivalent to a little more than three bricks – of suspected heroin in his rectum. Police said they found $920 in cash in Kovalchuk's pants pocket.
Kovalchuk was placed in the Washington County Correctional Facility in lieu of $50,000 cash bond.
A preliminary hearing is scheduled 11 a.m. April 16 before Hopkins.
Chris Buckley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-684-2642 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.