Steelers dominate on the court
Antonio Brown scored for the Pittsburgh Steelers again. This time, however, it was on the hardwood instead of the gridiron.
The Pittsburgh Steelers went to the Convocation Center at California University of Pennsylvania on May 2 to take on the CalU All-Stars. The Cal U squad was made up of players and faculty and was coached by Cal's Interim President Geraldine M. Jones, while her husband Jeff coached the Steelers.
The Pro Bowl receiver Brown was joined by Robert Golden, Ross Ventrone, Chris Carter, Mortty Ivy, Kelvin Beachum and Alameda Ta'amu for the Steelers. The proceeds from the game went to the Jeanie Carter Scholarship Fund.
“It was a great opportunity to support the scholarship program and help others have a great college career,” CalU senior Gloria Stone said. “Also, as a Steelers fan, it's always great to see your team helping out the community in some sort of way.”
Golden threw down a couple of dunks, but it was Brown who stole the show. He shot early and often, earning the nickname “Downtown Antonio Brown” from the announcers. The lefty shot three after three, but his poor shooting percentage didn't take away from the show.
“I enjoyed the game all around,” Stone said. “It was an entertaining event from the game, to the players, and even the coaching staff.”
The Steelers topped the CalU All-Stars, 86-59. The whole team signed autographs at halftime, even Brown's son, Antonio Brown Jr.
The fans got to interact with the players while raising money for a good cause in the process. Although the scoreboard was one-sided, it was a win-win for everyone.
“I had never been to a Steelers basketball game before, but after this one I would go to any basketball game because it was entertaining and for a good cause,” Stone said.
Tyler Kimmel is a freelance writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.