ShareThis Page

Federal loan sought for Washington Township sewer project

| Thursday, May 9, 2013, 1:46 a.m.

The Washington Township supervisors began the process of securing federal money to pay off the $20.8-million sewer project.

The board Wednesday adopted a resolution to seek a $5,466,300 loan from the USDA Rural Utilities Service. In conjunction with the Washington Township Municipal Authority, the money will be used to pay remaining bills.

Solicitor Don McCue said the township must provide documentation to the U.S. Department of Community and Economic Development and, if the township shows it can guarantee the loan as a joint partner in the debt, the money should be available.

The municipal authority obtained an interim loan from PNC Bank to cover most project costs.

The RUS loan will be used to repay PNC Bank and any remaining obligations, McCue said.

“The municipal authority is primarily liable for the loan and the township is secondarily liable for it,” McCue said.

Unused money will be returned to RUS, said McCue, adding the authority must agree to increase fees and expenses, if necessary, to repay the loan.

“The actual authority is owned by the taxpayers of Washington Township, so (the authority) has to guarantee this money gets paid back,” Supervisor Arnold Dull said.

In the works for five years, the project is approaching completion.

Dull said approximately 400 residences – about 25 percent of approximately 1,600 affected homes – must still tap-in to the system.

Officers hired

The board hired two part-time police offers – Ryan McWreath and Stephen Olesky – at a rate of $13 per hour. The hiring comes after two officers recently left the township for full-time positions at local universities.

Dull and Miller voted to hire the pair while Supervisor Chuck Yusko abstained, because he wanted more background information and references for the officers.

Dull, a former state trooper, said it's difficult for the township to compete for part-time law enforcement while paying its current hourly wage.

“What it comes down to is money, and you can't blame them for going somewhere else that's stable and something they can live on,” Dull said. “(Part-time officers) aren't always available, because they work for other departments, and we're one of the lowest paid.”

Dull said the supervisors considered hiring another full-time officer, but didn't because of financial concerns. The township employs two full-time officers and five part-time officers.

“We're fortunate that we can have somebody for $13 an hour go out and strap a gun on and take on what's out there, because I wouldn't do it,” Dull said.

“There's West Newton paying $15 an hour, sheriff's department makes $15 an hour and we're paying $13.”

In another matter, the board received a letter from the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation about repairs to the Perry Avenue bridge.

Dull said a township and a Fayette County engineers will develop a repair plan and submit it to PennDOT. Dull added the state-mandated deadline for the project is April 2014, but Miller said the sooner, the better.

“We want to address it now,” Miller said. “When PennDOT brings something to our attention, we look into it immediately.”

Rick Bruni Jr. is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at or 724-684-2635.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.