Craigslist ad leads to robbery
A man seeking a “casual encounter,” over the weekend instead got robbed.
But the alleged criminals seeking to spend the stolen money walked right into the arms of a police officer.
As a result, Aimee J. Golden, 38, of 3603 Washington Ave., Finleyville, was charged with criminal conspiracy and recklessly endangering another person. She was remanded to the Washington County jail in lieu of $50,000 straight cash bond.
Kristopher Laughlin, 29, of 529 North Sixth St., Clairton, was charged with robbery, criminal conspiracy, terroristic threats and recklessly endangering another person. He was remanded to the Washington County jail in lieu of $50,000 straight cash bond.
According to police, the male victim, whom police did not identify, answered a listing on craigslist.org for “casual encounters.” He made arrangements by email and through a telephone call to meet a woman named Aimee at her home at 3603 Washington Ave., Finleyville.
When he arrived there at 3 a.m. Saturday, a man wearing a mask and wielding a baseball bat and large knife allegedly robbed the victim of money and a cellular telephone.
Escaping, the victim went to the Sunoco in Finleyville, where he found a Monongahela police officer and reported the crime.
The officer called for back-up and was still in the Sunoco station when Golden and Laughlin walked in, police reported. They were arrested and the phone and money were recovered from Laughlin's home, police reported.
Chris Buckley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-684-2642 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.