Alleged scrap metal thieves face trial in Monongahela
Two men arrested while allegedly trying to steal scrap metal April 23 from the shuttered Patterson Supply building in Monongahela have been ordered to stand trial.
Brad A. Behanna, 27, of 866 Route 481, Carroll Township, and William Arthur Leasure, 35, of 177 First Ave., New Eagle, waived their rights to preliminary hearings Wednesday in Monongahela before Magisterial District Judge Mark Wilson.
Behanna and Leasure are each charged with burglary, criminal conspiracy, theft by unlawful taking or disposition, criminal attempt and criminal trespass.
One count of burglary against each man was dropped.
Monongahela police officers caught the two in the act before the suspects could get to their getaway bicycles, according to an affidavit of probable cause filed in Charleroi with Magisterial District Judge Larry Hopkins last month.
Police were dispatched to Patterson Supply 11:44 a.m. April 23 to check out two suspicious people on the property.
Behanna and Leasure tried to flee from the building, but were chased down by Officer William Fusco.
He was cited recently by Monongahela Mayor Bob Kepics for his work in making the arrest.
According to the affidavit, the suspects admitted to riding their bicycles to the property, knowing there was scrap metal on the site.
The suspects carried 12 large industrial drill bits, heavy metal sewer grates, a large crane wheel and a heavy metal blower, the affidavit stated.
After the court appearance, they were returned to the Washington County Correctional Facility, each in lieu of $35,000 bond.
Chris Buckley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-684-2642 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.