Police looking for driver in Speers hit-run accident
Police are looking for the driver of a pickup truck who left the scene of an accident in Speers – allegedly to head off to a driver's education class.
William Franks, 73, who resides in the Nathan Goff Apartments, North Charleroi, suffered a broken femur and collar bone and punctured lung in the Monday incident, police reported. He was transported to Mon Valley Hospital and later transferred to a Pittsburgh-based hospital. No condition information was available.
Witnesses told police a black Chevrolet Z-71 driven by a young man struck Franks shortly after noon in the parking lot of the PNC Bank, located on Route 88.
One witness told police that Franks told her, “that truck just hit me.”
The driver and another man, who witnesses believed was the driver's father, went over to check on Franks. The young man seemed concerned and said, “I didn't see him.” The older man interrupted him, saying, “We just saw that he fell and came to check on him.”
Another witness said the young man then said, “I don't think I hit him, he fell.”
Franks told police that after the truck struck him and knocked him over, it backed over him.
As Charleroi firefighters arrived on the scene, the father said, “We gotta go. I have to get him to driver's ed.”
Police said they are checking bank surveillance cameras.
Police are looking for additional witnesses.
“We're looking for these people to come forward, too,” said Charleroi Regional Police Det. Eric Porter said. “We're treating it as an accident at this point.”
Chris Buckley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-684-2642 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.