ShareThis Page

Progress Council gets highway update

| Saturday, June 29, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

Visiting state Rep. Rick Saccone in Harrisburg recently, Joe Kirk noticed a miniature of the Battle of Concord – including the North Bridge – that sits on the lawmaker's desk.

Sending a follow-up email to Saccone after their meeting, Kirk reminded the Elizabeth Township Republican, “That's not the only bridge we should be concerned about.”

The April 19, 1775, Battle of Concord – in Massachussets – was the American colonists' first victory over the British in the Revolutionary War.

These could be revolutionary times for transportation funding in Pennsylvania. State lawmakers are considering legislation that could significantly increase funding for roads, highways and bridges.

“For the expressway, this represents a monumental opportunity,” Kirk said Friday, shortly after updating Mon Valley Progress Council executive committee and board members on the status of transportation funding proposals.

The progress council executive director noted that Senate Bill 1 of 2013 –- introduced by state Sen. John Rafferty, who represents suburban Philadelphia, aims to raise the cap on the oil franchise tax, which is $1.25 of the price of a gallon of gas at the pump. The bill would more than double that amount.

The Rafferty bill phases in the increase over three years and would would increase transportation spending by roughly 60 percent.

A House proposal would phase in the increase over five years.

Kirk said a delegation of progress council leaders, along with members of the Mon Yough Chamber of Commerce, visited Harrisburg June 18 to advocate passage of a state transportation bill.

Kirk said he told Saccone that 12 bridges in his district would be funded under the new bill.

If new transportation funding is approved, major portions of the Mon/Fayette Expressway could be built in Saccone's district, Kirk said.

If the Republican lawmaker votes for the transportation funding, he would have the leverage to lobby turnpike officials for new revenue for expressway construction.

Kirk said one provision of Senate Bill 1 designates that 14 percent of money generated from an increase in oil franchise tax be allocated to Act 61 expansion projects.

“That really focuses on the Southern Beltway and expressway,” Kirk said.

The allocation designated for Act 61 projects would generate as much as $115 million, which would raise $1.2 billion when bonded.

“That's how important this is,” Kirk said. “This is monumental. If this passes, we're back in business for the Mon/Fayette Expressway and the Southern Beltway.”

Kirk predicted there is “a 75 percent chance” transportation funding will be approved and signed into law. Asked for a time frame, Kirk noted that the Legislature is scheduled to end its current session Sunday.

Chris Buckley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-684-2642 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.