3 men sought for shooting in Monessen
Police are seeking three Pittsburgh men after a Monessen man was shot and critically injured at a city residence late Saturday night over a drug-related issue.
Brian Simpson, 41, of 948 Athalia Ave., Monessen, remained in critical condition Sunday at Allegheny General Hospital in Pittsburgh, according to a hospital spokeswoman.
Simpson was shot multiple times in the chest 11:16 p.m. Saturday in the kitchen at 637 Summit Ave., Monessen.
The house is rented by Lee Hall, 64, and is a location associated with suspected drug activity, according to Chief John Mandarino.
Mandarino said the suspects are three unidentified black males from the Homewood section of Pittsburgh. Police were only able to obtain nicknames of two suspects: “Diesel” and “Tall Boy.” The latter also goes by “T,” according to Mandarino, who said all are believed to be gang members.
The alleged shooters had supposedly arrived in a light green Ford Explorer, Mandarino said. At least one and possibly two of them shot Simpson before leaving.
Seven people were inside the home at the time of the shooting, including three women, Mandarino said. The other four witnesses had fled before police arrived.
Simpson was conscious and able to speak when police arrived despite bleeding profusely, Mandarino said.
Mandarino said he enlisted several outside law enforcement agencies in the hopes of capturing the three suspects, including the State Police narcotics unit and three Pittsburgh-based agencies.
Anyone with information is urged to call Monessen police at 724-684-4620. Mandarino said all callers will remain anonymous.
Rick Bruni Jr. is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at email@example.com or 724-684-2635.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.