ShareThis Page

Leak within the WWE?

| Saturday, July 20, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

This past Sunday, the WWE held its annual July PPV, Money in the Bank and the show turned out to be a relatively strong card.

While the WWE covered the newsworthy information the next night on Raw, there was more information reported and the story is picking up steam.

Someone in the know within the WWE made it known before the show the order of matches and who would win on a website under an anonymous name.

While this was shocking to me as the WWE keeps things so tight-lipped, I was floored at the next piece of information about the leak.

Apparently the Money in the Bank show was the 38th straight PPV that this unnamed person reported the order and winners.

Several questions immediately popped into my head upon reading about this.

First off, how could this happen?

The McMahon's go through writers like they are going out of style.

Part of the reason is burnout on the part of the individuals writing the shows, and part of it is because the McMahon's are so demanding behind the scenes.

I was dumbfounded and almost shocked that this happened once let alone for more than three years now.

My next question was who would have done it?

Most superstars are only informed of their own matches and storylines, although a few top names are in the loop of everything that is going on.

So why would someone do this?

The anonymous person stated that he did it to prove to the McMahon's that they are wrong in believing that things are kept iron clad quiet.

When signed, it is put into the contracts of the talents that they are not allowed to discuss things with those outside the company, much like with actors on movie sets.

But this wrestler has been doing it for over three years now, so how will things change in the WWE?

My guess is that a lot of the long-term storylines that they have been writing will be scrapped and the angles will be built short term again.

Only recently with Triple H getting more say so behind the scenes has the writing slowly started moving back to plans that are built up for months instead of from one PPV to the next.

The WWE needs to continue to give the fans storylines and draw in their attention and by going back to fast angles is not the way to get things done.

Triple H and the writers have been doing a solid job in recent months of giving lower card wrestlers important feuds and even more important face time on TV, so by eliminating long term plans, the younger or newer talents will not be given time to get established.

Think about it.

Most of the newer guys weren't even on the WWE's main roster 38 months ago when the leaks began, so why would the WWE take it out on them?

Email questions/comments to Bill at powerhousehughes@hotmail.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.