Donora traffic stop nets drug arrests
Three Valley residents are facing drug charges after Donora police found suspected heroin in their vehicle during a traffic stop around 5 p.m. Monday.
Donora police charged Shaun Christopher Kovacs, 25, of 320 Henry St., Belle Vernon, was charged with possession of a controlled substance, suspected heroin and possession of drug paraphernalia.
Nathan Charles Cameron, 22, of 65 Delsandro Drive, Donora, was charged with manufacture, delivery, or possession with intent to manufacture or deliver a controlled substance, possession of a controlled substance, and use/possession of drug paraphernalia.
Cameron and Kovacs were arraigned at 8 p.m. before Magisterial District Judge James Ellis via video and remanded to the Washington County Correctional Facility in lieu of $25,000 cash bond. A third suspect, Frank W. Spahr, 26, of 307 West 10th St., Donora, was placed in the Washington County Correctional Facility on a probation warrant and will be charged at a later date, police said.
Donora police observed a black Chevrolet Cobalt traveling north in the 1300 block of Marelda Avenue with a burned out right brake light.
Police stopped the vehicle and identified the driver as Kovacs.
Spahr identified himself as Ricky Fine although police identified him as Spahr, who had active warrants out of Washington County Adult Probation.
The passenger's compartment had an odor of burnt marijuana, police reported. Given permission by Kovacs to search the vehicle, police found a razor blade in the center dash and 10 bricks of packaged heroin in a black zipped first aid kit. Three stamp bags of heroin were missing, but police reported they found 497 heroin stamp bags.
Chris Buckley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-684-2642 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.