Cops: Monongahela caregiver fleeced blind woman
A Monongahela resident is accused of altering personal checks to steal money from a blind woman under her care.
Karen M. Burton, 45, of 521 Park Ave., allegedly provided Monongahela police with amounts she had forged or altered on checks signed by Veronica Marraccini.
On May 8, Marraccini told police she wrote a $50 check to Burton. The check subsequently was changed to read $550, she said.
Marraccini told police she is legally blind and cannot see to handle bills.
Marraccini had an agreement in which she paid some utilities and other expenses associated with living with Burton and her family, according to an affidavit of probable cause filed with Magisterial District Judge Mark Wilson in Monongahela.
Burton allegedly admitted to police that she altered the check by putting another “5” in front of the $50 written on the check. Burton admitted she did the same on other occasions, receiving $550, $250, $350 and $950 from Marraccini's checking account, police claim.
Burton also allegedly admitted she opened a Capital One Mastercard account and a Bill Me Later account in Marraccini's name. The Mastercard account showed a $155 balance. The Bill Me Later account was for $427.60, police said.
Burton is charged with five counts of forgery-alter writing, seven counts of theft by deception-false impression, and two counts of access device fraud.
She was arraigned Wednesday by Wilson and was placed in the Washington County Correctional Facility in lieu of $25,000 straight cash bond.
Jeremy Sellew is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 724-684-2667.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.