Search for shooting suspects in Donora comes up empty
Police and U.S. marshals locked down the 800 block of Thompson Avenue in Donora for about two hours Wednesday afternoon in an unsuccessful attempt to find two fugitives wanted for a July shooting in Monessen.
More than 20 local police officers and members of a fugitive task force began searching about 2 p.m. for Rufus Poindexter and Derrick Jones at one of three suspected residences, according to Monessen police.
Police said the pair are considered to be armed and dangerous.
Poindexter and Jones, both of Homewood, are charged in the attempted murder of a Monessen man July 6 at 637 Summit Ave. The alleged victim, Brian Simpson, is recovering from multiple gunshots to the chest.
Although the suspects were not found, Monessen police said they discovered evidence that indicated the two had been staying in Donora as recently as Tuesday.
Police said Poindexter and Jones were thought to be staying outside the Pittsburgh area.
Jodi Lynn Cook, 35, of Monessen, also faces attempted murder and other charges for the shooting. Police said Cook allegedly set up Simpson over drug money – purportedly owed to the Homewood men.
She remains in Westmoreland County Prison in lieu of $50,000 straight cash bond. Another suspect present during the shooting has not been identified. Investigators, however, claim Poindexter and Jones are the shooters.
Officers from the Charleroi Regional, Rostraver and Donora police departments assisted during Wednesday's search.
Monessen police said the department will continue to use every avenue at its disposal to apprehend the suspects.
Rick Bruni is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 724-684-2635.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.