Excavation worker injured in Monessen mishap
A worker from Mornak Excavation was hurt after the collaspe of a sewage drain he was working on along 9th street in Monessen. On scene was Monessen Number 1 and Hilltop Number 2, Lock 4 Volunteer Fire Departments, Monessen Police and The Mon Valley EMS on Tuesday September 3,2013.
Photo by Jim Ference | The Valley Independent
An employee of a private contractor working on a city drainage project on Ninth Street in Monessen was injured Tuesday when part of a brick wall fell on him.
Dane Mornak, son of the owner of that company, Mornak Excavation of Rostraver Township, was taken to Monongahela Valley Hospital in Carroll Township after a portion of the wall fell on his foot shortly after 3 p.m.
Leonard Billy, city streets department superintendent, said first responders helped pull the bricks off Mornak, who became trapped in mud as a result of the weight on his foot.
Firefighters from Monessen Volunteer Fire Department No. 1, Monessen Hilltop Volunteer Fire Department and the Lock Four Volunteer Fire Co. responded.
Billy said Mornak was transported by Mon Valley Emergency Medical Services to the hospital for X-rays and other treatment.
City Administrator John Harhai said crews are working on a collapsed 20-foot wall, part of a drainage area spanning from Ninth Street to Knox Avenue, which was recently discovered.
Harhai said a 20-foot side of the wall collapsed, sending 10-15 tons of dirt into the drainage area.
It was a part of an arched cherry wall, shaped like a tear drop, which was built in 1890s between two hills.
Erosion caused by water beneath the surface weakened the wall.
Mornak Excavation was hired to do the work, Harhai said.
Chris Buckley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 724-684-2642.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.