Most serious charge dropped against Cal U football player
The most serious charge against a California University of Pennsylvania football player was withdrawn Monday.
Claudy Mathieu, 20, of Philadelphia, was arrested by California police Aug. 31 on charges he knocked down Mashkhal Ibriham, 21, of Harrisonburg, Va., and punched him repeatedly in the face and chest. The alleged assault occurred while a large crowd of people began shouting back and forth on both sides of the 300 block of Third Street. That's when Mathieu allegedly ran across the street and assaulted Ibriham, police said. Ibriham required medical attention for his injuries, police said.
The Washington County District Attorney's office withdrew the aggravated assault charge Monday at the Centerville office of Magisterial District Judge Joshua Kanalis. Mathieu waived his right to a preliminary hearing on misdemeanor counts of simple assault and disorderly conduct and a summary citation for harassment.
Kanalis changed Mathieu's bond from $30,000 straight cash to unsecured. Mathieu was still lodged at the Washington County Correctional Facility Monday night.
Mathieu, a redshirt freshman defensive lineman, has been suspended by the football team while the matter is investigated. Cal U spokeswoman Christine Kindle previously said the university's discipline process will also address the issue.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.