Police: School security guard drunkenly waved gun inside Speers gas station
A newly hired school security guard is accused of waving a gun inside the Speers Exxon and shouting, “I shoot to kill.”
Val Smith, 41, of 119 Crest St., Upper Speers, was charged by Charleroi Regional police with recklessly endangering another person, disorderly conduct, and public drunkenness.
Smith was allegedly intoxicated when he walked into the Exxon at 12:29 a.m. Saturday, according to the affidavit of probable cause filed at the office of Magisterial District Judge Larry Hopkins in Charleroi.
He allegedly showed three store employees his concealed weapons permit. Smith repeatedly asked the employees to write down his telephone number, saying he “only lived around the corner,” according to the affidavit. He told the employees, “I could be here before the police could.”
Employees told police Smith pulled out a black gun, waved it and yelled, “I shoot to kill.”
Smith was hired as an armed security officer for the Charleroi Area School District, as he has Act 235 clearance to carry a handgun.
District Superintendent Dr. Brad Ferko said Smith had not yet worked for the district because the school year just started.
“It's a personnel issue, so it's something I can't discuss,” Ferko said. “The board has been informed about the alleged incident.”
Smith's preliminary hearing is scheduled for 10 a.m. Oct. 3 before Hopkins.
Chris Buckley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-684-2642 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.