Washington Township contractor facing more theft charges
A Greensburg man accused of conning Washington Township residents out of more than $18,000 for sewerage work he did not perform faces additional criminal charges.
Washington Township police filed additional counts of theft by deception and receiving stolen property against William E. Rager, 34, of 110 Cannon Drive.
H is accused of allegedly taking money to install sewer lines at a Dent Street home on July 26, 2012, and a home on Blatnik Lane on Sept. 1, 2012.
Washington Township police previously filed eight separate counts of theft by deception and receiving stolen property against Rager at the office of Magisterial District Justice Jesse Cramer of Belle Vernon for similar alleged incidents ranging from early August to late October of 2012.
Police said Rager took checks from 10 alleged victims – mostly under the guise of written contracts –after agreeing to install sewerage tap-ins. In nearly every case, Rager never returned to start the work and repeated attempts to contact him afterward were unsuccessful, polic e said.
Rager is also facing drug charges in Westmoreland County. His whereabouts are still unknown, police said.
Anyone with information on Rager's location is asked to call Washington Township police at 724-929-6940 or state police in Greensburg at 724-832-3288.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.