Cops: Drugs found in Monessen house
A Monessen man was arrested Thursday evening at his 412 Pearl St. home, where police seized a large amount of suspected marijuana and nearly two dozen narcotic pills.
Police subsequently arrested a Penn Hills man who allegedly supplied the drugs.
Several neighbors applauded as Monessen police officers escorted Aaron Anderson, 30, from his home, where officers executed a search warrant around 5:30 p.m.
Police allegedly found nearly 1½ pounds of marijuana, including a one-pound brick, along with 20 oxycodone pills, scales and other drug paraphernalia.
Most of the marijuana was high-potency grade, Monessen police Chief John Mandarino said.
Police said the pills sell for about $30 apiece on the street. They estimated the value of the marijuana at approximately $2,000.
Shortly after serving the warrant, police arrested Kevon Green, 41, of Penn Hills following a traffic stop along Tyrol Boulevard.
Officers said they received information that Green is a supplier for Anderson.
Although they found no drugs in Green's possession, Monessen police impounded Green's SUV and obtained a warrant to search the vehicle. They allegedly found a small amount of marijuana and $5,000 in the SUV.
Both men were taken to Westmoreland County Prison in Hempfield Township and are scheduled to be arraigned Friday morning by Magisterial District Judge Joseph Dalfonso of Monessen, police said.
The arrests resulted from an ongoing investigation involving Monessen police, the state Attorney General's office and North Versailles police.
Mandarino said his department has received numerous reports of suspected drug sales at Anderson's residence in the past month.
Rick Bruni Jr. is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 724-684-2635.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.