Monessen man jailed on drug charges following traffic stop
A Monessen man is in jail after police allegedly found him in possession of nearly 7 grams of heroin during a Monday evening traffic stop.
Aaron E. Jackson, 21, with a last-known address of 616 Division St., was charged with felony counts of possession with intent to manufacture or deliver a controlled substance and conspiracy and one misdemeanor count of possession of a controlled substance.
Monessen police Lt. Jim Smith said he conducted a traffic stop 6:08 p.m. Monday at the intersection of Sixth Street and Motheral Avenue because the vehicle had an expired registration sticker. Jackson was a passenger in the front seat.
While patting down Jackson for safety precautions, police said they found a wad of money totaling $515 and an empty stamp bag of suspected heroin marked “Menace 2 Society”.
Police said the driver, Amanda Holma, 21, of Stockdale, gave consent for a vehicle search and Smith subsequently found a backpack on the floor where Jackson was allegedly seated.
Inside the backpack, Smith said he found a yellow shopping bag containing 190 stamp bags of suspected heroin marked “Menace 2 Society” and a clear plastic baggie with unpackaged suspected heroin, weighing approximately 3 grams.
One gram of unpackaged heroin equals 50 stamp bags, or five bundles, Smith said.
Jackson was arraigned Tuesday morning in front of Magisterial District Judge Joseph Dalfonso in Monessen and sent to the Westmoreland County Prison in lieu of $150,000 cash bond.
His preliminary hearing is scheduled for 10 a.m. Oct. 25 in front of Dalfonso.
Police said the investigation is continuing.
Rick Bruni Jr. is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-684-2635 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.