ShareThis Page

Railroad crossings concern in Mon City

| Tuesday, Oct. 22, 2013, 12:26 a.m.

Tom Caudill remembers hearing the whistle blow one November night in 1952.

The shrill blast notified people in Collinsburg that a train had struck a school bus.

“And that crossing was just like this crossing (in Monongahela) that I'm talking about,” the city councilman said.

“It had no lights and no crossing arm. And some kids were killed in that accident. That's something that will stay with me forever.”

Caudill said safety is the reason the city wants Norfolk Southern Railroad to improve crossings that provide access to the Noble J. Dick Aquatorium.

Councilwoman Claudia Williams said she agrees the area should be improved, but said fencing a two-block area would improve safety by controlling pedestrian traffic.

Caudill, Williams, Councilman Bill Hess Sr. and Mayor Bob Kepics met Thursday morning at the aquatorium with officials from the Public Utility Commission and Norfolk Southern.

Donora Mayor John Lignelli, who serves with Caudill on the Mid Mon Valley Transit Authority Board, helped arrange the meeting.

Norfolk Southern officials proposed to expand the pedestrian crossing at Third Street, behind McDonald's and next to newly-constructed comfort building, to the left of the former Patterson Supply building.

Safety lights and a crossing arm would be installed and the sidewalk widened. Crossings at Second and Fourth streets would be closed. Caudill said that with events over the summer, the July 4 fireworks show and the upcoming Halloween parade, the aquatorium drew more than 30,000 people.

“That's not a well-lit area and trains go up and down that way all the time,” Caudill said. “With mass number of people, we felt this was a safety issue for the city. That's an accident waiting to happen.”

Caudill said Norfolk Southern has agreed to pay for the roughly $1 million crossing project.

Caudill said he plans to bring up the issue at council's Nov. 13 meeting. Council must approve the work before the yearlong project can begin.

Williams said the issue is not new, but claimed the rail company is now being cooperative to the city's needs. She expects council to discuss it at a Nov. 12 work session, the day before voting on the project.

Williams said opening the crossing at Third Street would isolate the former Patterson Supply Co. property and make that area a main thoroughfare for aquatorium events.

“We would have to have two-lane traffic going in two directions at Third Street,” Williams said. “And you'd have event-goers on foot crossing traffic.”

Williams said fencing the area between Second and Fourth streets would funnel pedestrian traffic into crossing at that area.

She said pedestrians now cross the train tracks all along a multi-block area, creating safety concerns.

“If you fenced between Second and Fourth streets, I think that would solve 85 to 90 percent of the problem,” Williams said.

Chris Buckley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-684-2642 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.