ShareThis Page

Belle Vernon Area superintendent ready to make more changes

| Friday, Nov. 15, 2013, 12:36 a.m.
Belle Vernon Area Superintendent Dr. John Wilkinson discusses future plans during a public informational meeting Thursday, Nov. 14, 2013, in the high school auditorium.
Rick Bruni | The Valley Independent
Belle Vernon Area Superintendent Dr. John Wilkinson discusses future plans during a public informational meeting Thursday, Nov. 14, 2013, in the high school auditorium.
“I hope people know I care,' said Belle Vernon Area School District Superintendent Dr. John Wilkinson. 'I had a calling to be an educator and leader, and it was a strong one.'
“I hope people know I care,' said Belle Vernon Area School District Superintendent Dr. John Wilkinson. 'I had a calling to be an educator and leader, and it was a strong one.'

Proposed changes in the Belle Vernon Area School District might not be as drastic as last year's middle school realignment.

But Superintendent Dr. John Wilkinson hopes his latest plan, unveiled at a public informational meeting Thursday, has a significant benefit to students.

Among Wilkinson's goals are a grading scale expansion and individual learning plan for each student.

The school board would have to approve any change.

First, Wilkinson would like the district to change its grading system to a 10-point scale, meaning an “A” grade would be given for test scores ranging from 90 to 100 percent, instead of the current 93 to 100. Likewise, a “B” would be given for an 80 to 90 percent result, from the current 85 to 92 percent.

Wilkinson said the liberalized policy would be outweighed by a more rigorous curriculum under which children are “challenged but not overwhelmed.” He cited the more concentrated Algebra I classes at the middle school this year as an example.

“Someone who goes to Elizabeth Forward or Upper St. Clair can get an 89.5 and still get an A, and our kids don't, so what does that mean on your transcript?” Wilkinson said.

“Some people will say, ‘Oh, you're going to water it down, everyone is going to get A's, but the truth is if someone wanted to water it down now, they could.”

The grades, likewise, would be 90-percent weighted toward “formal assessments” like projects, tests and lab work. Extra credit or bonus points awarded for fund raisers would be eliminated.

“I think that brings us back into some rigor,” he said. “It brings us back into the kids being competitive against themselves.”

Under the second goal, Wilkinson wants the district to gather information on each student and eventually tailor learning and testing to the each student's strengths. He compared the desired academic data necessary to doctors keeping medical records for individual patients.

“Ultimately, what I want to have is if you type in (a student's name) it says he needs to sit in the front of the room because he doesn't pay attention real well, and he learns best when it's visual as opposed to auditory, and he does better on tests when they're chunked into four questions at a time,” he said.

Wilkinson said he has programmers interested and aims to have a “schematic” idea in place by May for students in grades nine through 11.

“It's a vision I have, and I think with the administration and teachers we have, we can figure something out, even if it's paper and pencil off the bat,” he said.

Wilkinson said coming up with a fair, concise evaluation is a daunting task – he joked that the creator might make a fortune by selling the software to other school districts – but insisted the result could be each student learning to his or her specific abilities and tendencies.

He said another key is each student taking an “ownership” stake in his or her learning process.

“If the kids don't learn something in third period, and they can go find the teacher and say, ‘Hey I didn't learn this,' then we've turned the corner,” Wilkinson said.

“That's pretty powerful to be able to sit down with a kid and say, ‘OK, you didn't learn the Pythagorean theorem … let's sit down and get you squared away.'”

Wilkinson said another goal is bringing district cyber school students back to BVA classrooms on a part-time basis. He said cutting off potential cyber students at a young age would help “stop the bleeding.”

Wilkinson said he estimates the 56 current cyber school students cost the district nearly $500,000 – a price tag of approximately $12,500 per student.

Anticipating five to six retirements in the coming year, Wilkinson proposed the district sharpen its hiring process for new teachers – which he called a “35-year, $2 million commitment” for each hire. This includes “vetting” applications and having the finalists undergo “teach-off” exercises in which they would literally teach lesson plans to administrators.

Wilkinson said that as part of an induction plan, he intends to “Belle Vernonize” neophyte instructors and end speculation about hires being made for political reasons.

Lastly, Wilkinson wants to continue implementing a STEM – Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics – curriculum centered on specialized engineering classes. Wilkinson wants the high school to offer high-level engineering courses by the 2015-2016 school year.

As for integrating seventh and eighth grade students into a single middle school while keeping sixth graders an extra year at their respective elementary schools – a controversial proposal at this time last year —Wilkinson offered no regrets.

“A couple parents who were my biggest critics and calling me every day … came up to me and said, ‘My kid's so happy,' and me being a little bit of a smart alec, I said, ‘And?'” Wilkinson recalled. “They said ‘OK, you were right, we were wrong,' and I don't need to hear that – maybe at home once in awhile – but it's going well.”

Rick Bruni Jr. is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at or 724-684-2635.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.