Engineering payment tabled by authority
The Municipal Authority of Washington Township on Tuesday declined to pay an invoice for nearly $500,000 to its former engineering firm.
The $496,662 invoice for storm sewer project work was issued in May by Bankson Engineers Inc. for labor performed in 2006, according to board members Chuck Yusko and Tim Naulty.
Yusko said the authority did not receive the invoice until this year.
The original invoice requested a payment of $464,170. A monthly interest of $4,642 has been tacked on to the total. The board tabled a motion to pay the bill at Tuesday's monthly agenda meeting. Yusko, Naulty and Dave Samek voted to table the motion while Julius Petrosky opposed.
At issue, Petrosky said, is documentation for hours worked and that Bankson supplied that, but McCue and a majority of the board demanded time cards and a breakdown of hours charged to justify the fee.
“I think once we take this off the agenda, I think we're going to court,” Petrosky said.
“From about 2007 to present there's always been engineering fees going forward from year to year,” Petrosky added, after the meeting. “All of a sudden, we're asking for time cards. We've never asked for time slips before from any contractor to verify before. This project came in way under budget, and I think they're legally owed this money.”
The invoice was to be paid out of tap-in fees collected throughout the township.
Solicitor Don McCue said the bill should not be paid Tuesday, “because of a lack of information supplied by Bankson.”
At a previous authority meeting, Bankson project engineer Dave Kerchner addressed the board, but did not give enough specifics to warrant paying the invoice, according to Samek.
“A former board member questioned him about the summary sheets he said were very clear and he did furnish those summary sheets and they were far from clear, so it didn't help the situation at all,” Samek said.
“You're waiting for information that's never going to come,” resident Dan Moody said.
“You can't pay this bill without having invoices to know what we're paying for,” Yusko said.
“I understand that the information is there,” Moody replied.
“It's not satisfactory to the board,” McCue said.
“This thing is there accruing interest,” Moody said. “It's costing us money.”
The authority voted in January to cut ties with Bankson, its firm for more than two decades, and hired McMillen Engineering.
Bankson performed the sewer design and majority of installation for the township's sewage project, which began in 2006.
Rick Bruni Jr. is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 724-684-2635.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.