Monessen burglary suspect caught in ceiling crawl space
A Monessen man is in jail after police responded to a break-in and found him hiding in a ceiling crawl space.
Monessen police said Robert Welch, 35, of 105 Reed Ave., allegedly broke into an abandoned Reed Avenue residence around 11:30 a.m. Tuesday to steal copper tubing.
Officer Jim Franks was the first to respond and heard power tools being used as he approached the house, according to an affidavit of probable cause.
Franks entered the house through a window that had been forced open and unlocked a door to let in police Chief John Mandarino, officer Aaron Thompson and K-9 officer Uri.
Police said they went upstairs and saw copper tubing and tools on the floor. Mandarino then saw a crawl space in one of the walls. K-9 officer Uri indicated someone was inside the crawl space.
With Mandarino keeping watch, the other three officers went downstairs and Franks stood on a table, looked into the open drop ceiling and saw Welch allegedly squeezed inside the cramped space.
Welch then crawled out of the space and was placed under arrest, police said.
He was charged with theft by unlawful taking, receiving stolen property and criminal trespass, arraigned by Magisterial District Judge Joseph Dalfonso in Monessen and sent to Westmoreland County Prison in lieu of $10,000 cash bond.
His preliminary hearing is scheduled for Dec. 6 in front of Dalfonso.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.