Worker finds man's body in Monessen
A Monessen man found dead Wednesday in a vacant house was not a victim of foul play, according to police and the Westmoreland County Coroner's office.
The body of Roderick Taft Jones Jr., 39, was discovered at 10:49 a.m. at the bottom of stairs at 649 S. 14th St.
A Southwestern Pennsylvania Human Services employee who was at the house to change locks found Jones, Monessen police Chief John Mandarino said.
The house was most recently rented by a person who now lives in Greensburg and was an acquaintance of Jones, Manderino said. The chief said Jones likely had been “squatting” at the house. Jones' last known address was 212 Rostraver St., Monessen, police said.
Westmoreland County Deputy Coroner Josh Zappone said it appears Jones had been dead “at least a couple days,” based on moderate body decomposition.
Pittsburgh forensic pathologist Dr. Cyril Wecht performed an autopsy on Jones on Wednesday but did not release a cause of death, pending toxicology results, Zappone said.
“There was no evidence of traumatic injuries or trauma,” Zappone said. “If he did fall down the steps, that's not what killed him.”
In October 2012, Jones pleaded guilty in Westmoreland County Court to loitering and prowling at night and served 133 days in prison, according to court documents. Charges of criminal trespass and criminal attempt – burglary were dismissed.
Rick Bruni Jr. is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at email@example.com or 724-684-2635.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.