North Charleroi pair to stand trial on charges they left children unattended
Two North Charleroi residents are facing trial after police said their unattended children caused a van to drift into a house.
Shane Kovatch, 27, and Tina Roberts, 29, both of 335 Pennsylvania Ave., were held for court Thursday on charges of endangering the welfare of children in connection with the Oct. 29 incident.
They appeared before Magisterial District Judge Larry Hopkins in Charleroi for preliminary hearings.
Charleroi Regional police also filed endangering the welfare of children charges against Vicki Charlton, 39, and Anthony Lybryer, 38, both of 351 Pennsylvania Ave. Their preliminary hearings were continued until 9 a.m. Jan. 6 before Hopkins.
The charges stem from the accident that occurred at 313 Sheppard Ave., North Charleroi. Emergency crews were called after a van struck the residence.
Police said three children were playing in the van when they knocked it out of gear, causing it to drift into the house.
Charlton allegedly told police she thought her son was upstairs and didn't realize he had gone outside, according to the affidavit of probable cause. Charlton said the van was unlocked because a window was broken, the report stated.
Kovatch and Roberts allegedly told police they believed their two daughters were playing in the yard when the accident occurred. Police said the children were treated for minor cuts.
Stacy Wolford is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-684-2640 or at email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.