Some charges withdrawn, others held in Belle Vernon man's sexual assault case
The most serious charges filed against a Belle Vernon man accused of sexually assaulting a young girl last year were withdrawn.
Carl William Smith IV, 27, appeared at the new district court office in Star Junction on Friday where he was held for court on charges of indecent assault of a person less than 13-years-old, corruption of minors, and unlawful contact with minor–sexual offenses.
Felony charges of rape of a child, statutory sexual assault, and sexual assault, were withdrawn. A felony count of aggravated indecent assault was dismissed.
Washington Township police filed the charges against Smith Nov. 20. The alleged assaults occurred Dec. 29, 2012, at the Marion Villa housing plan in the Arnold City section of the township
The Valley Independent does not identify sex crime victims. Police did not list the girl's age.
The victim allegedly told officials the assault began in an upstairs bedroom as she and Smith watched a movie and then continued downstairs.
Smith is currently free on $51,000 bail, according to court records.
He is scheduled for a formal arraignment at 9:30 a.m. Jan. 16 at the Fayette County Courthouse, Uniontown.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.