Belle Vernon Area board looks to avoid tax hike again next year
The current school budget cut millage for some Belle Vernon Area taxpayers and held the line for others.
And while the board and administration are not yet ready to make that same vow for the 2014-15 school year, the directors Monday night took the first step in that direction.
Meeting in regular session, the board approved a resolution agreeing to not raise millage beyond the state-regulated index. For Belle Vernon Area, that index is 2.9 mills, said business manager Eileen Navish. One mill raises roughly $170,000, Navish said.
In June, the board unanimously passed a $34,488,863 general fund budget for the current school year.
It set real estate tax rates at 76.36 mills for properties in Westmoreland County (Rostraver Township and North Belle Vernon) and 18.25 mills for properties in Fayette County (Belle Vernon, Fayette City and Washington Township).
In order to equalize taxes under state law, millage was lowered for Westmoreland properties. The 2012-13 rate is 77.21 mills.
Act 1 each year limits the percentage by which school districts can raise local real estate taxes. If districts exceed this limit, they must ask voters for approval.
“We're not going to referendum,” vowed Superintendent Dr. John Wilkinson following the board meeting.
Wilkinson said the administration has already begun to prepare for budget workshops, which the directors will undertake in January.
With the school year roughly half over, Wilkinson said the current budget looks good.
“We're right on target,” Wilkinson said. “Nothing has come up that we haven't planned for.”
Chris Buckley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-684-2642 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.